other sites
topics
archives
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- September 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- March 2010
- April 2010
- June 2010
- August 2010
- January 2011
- July 2011
- November 2011
Monday, March 10, 2008
Good Question
posted by barsoomcore
Reading some Ashoka literature today and came across this question:
What is the most critical factor for success in any organization these days?
Traditional factors like technology and marketing are losing their ability to reliably provide long-term advantages. It's too easy to catch up, and even pull ahead.
I agree with the Ashokans when they say it has to be the number and quality of innovative thinkers in the group. How innovative are your people, and how enthusiastically does the organization support their capacity for innovation? Nothing else will keep your group successful. The degree to which you stifle creativity and energy is the degree to which you limit your organization's potential.
It seems that in 2008 I will be spending no small amount of time building organizations. It will be interesting to see what sorts of structures I come up with in order to avoid stifling the members' innovative power.
What is the most critical factor for success in any organization these days?
Traditional factors like technology and marketing are losing their ability to reliably provide long-term advantages. It's too easy to catch up, and even pull ahead.
I agree with the Ashokans when they say it has to be the number and quality of innovative thinkers in the group. How innovative are your people, and how enthusiastically does the organization support their capacity for innovation? Nothing else will keep your group successful. The degree to which you stifle creativity and energy is the degree to which you limit your organization's potential.
It seems that in 2008 I will be spending no small amount of time building organizations. It will be interesting to see what sorts of structures I come up with in order to avoid stifling the members' innovative power.
Labels: Thinking
Post a Comment